The problem of the contemporary is not lack of good art. It is easy, there is a lot of it, e.g. there are quite a few good paintings being produced out there. However, the question to be asked is why good art is not interesting enough and thus not good enough. And that is because, what is of importance is not good art but rather one holding historical significance, and thus significant work, valid work in our particular moment of history. That is one, which is of interest, and that is also why somehow I feel inclined not to make good work with full determination.